Department of Energy Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science NEWTON's Homepage NEWTON's Homepage
NEWTON, Ask A Scientist!
NEWTON Home Page NEWTON Teachers Visit Our Archives Ask A Question How To Ask A Question Question of the Week Our Expert Scientists Volunteer at NEWTON! Frequently Asked Questions Referencing NEWTON About NEWTON About Ask A Scientist Education At Argonne Faraday Letter
Name: Peter
Status: other
Age: 60s
Location: N/A
Country: N/A
Date: 2000-2001


Question:
I am doing some research in electromagnetic induction, and found the following letter from Faraday that appears to contradict Lenz's law. I doubt very much that Faraday made a mistake here, but I have been unable to find a plausible explanation for this incongruity. Could you please help me elucidate this conundrum?


Replies:
Michael Faraday wrote to R. Phillips on Nov. 29, 1831:

"When an electric current is passed through one of two parallel wires it causes at first a current in the same direction through the other, but this induced current does not last a moment, notwithstanding the inducing current (from the Voltaic battery) is continued all seems unchanged except that the principal current continues its course, but when the current is stopped then a return current occurs in the wire under induction of about the same intensity and momentary duration but in the opposite direction to that first found. Electricity in currents therefore exerts an inductive action like ordinary electricity but subject to peculiar laws: the effects are a current in the same direction when the induction is established: a reverse current when the induction ceases and a peculiar state in the interim..."

I don't see a problem here. The induced emf in the undriven wire is proportional to the rate of change of the flux, so it's nonzero only while the current in the driven wire is changing.

Tim Mooney


Faraday's letter refers to two separate wires, not wire loops. As a result, it can be difficult to relate to Lenz'z Law.

When current begins to flow in the primary wire, the magnetic field around that wire begins to increase. As the magnetic field increases, it produces a current in the secondary wire. Because the field is stronger between the wires than beyond the secondary wire, the secondary current's magnetic field will oppose the magnetic field between the wires. To do this, both currents must be in the same direction. This agrees with Lenz's Law.

After the primary current is constant, there is no more change of magnetic field and no more induced current.

After the primary current is turned off, the primary magnetic field decreases. The change is opposite the change when turned on. To counter the decrease of magnetic field between the wires, the induced secondary current must be opposite what it was at the beginning. Thus, all of Faraday's letter agrees with Lenz's Law.

Kenneth Mellendorf


I don't think this contradicts Lenz's Law. Basically what Faraday is saying is that a changing electric current in the first wire induces currents in the second. As I recall it, Lenz's Law prohibits an induced current in a conductor (such as the second wire here) from reinforcing the magnetic field that does the inducing. Recall that the magnetic field from a current flowing in a straight line is a right-handed circle centered on the wire. The magnetic field from a current flowing in the same direction along a parallel path will also be a right-handed circle, opposing the first field in the regions of greatest overlap.

Bear in mind, though, that it's been a LONG time since I took Physics...

Richard E. Barrans Jr., Ph.D.
Assistant Director
PG Research Foundation, Darien, Illinois


Rather than dealing with written arguments and disagreements, be a true scientist: find out for yourself. There are several ways to try it.

Set up two fairly long adjacent wires, very close but not touching. Have the "primary wire" connected to an ammeter, resistor (to avoid too much current), and a power source. Connect the "secondary wire" to just an ammeter. Make both of them series circuits.

If you have a computer system that with sensors that can measure and record current as a function of time, have the sensors be the ammeters. Be sure "positive" current is in the same direction for both wires. After the computer system is recording, turn on the power source, wait a few seconds, and then turn off the power source. See what direction the secondary current flows with respect to the primary current.

If you prefer to use an oscilloscope and square wave function generator, you can. Use a square wave that is positive, then zero, then positive,.... The function generator powers the primary wire. Use one oscilloscope channel to read the current of the primary wire. Use another channel to read the current of the secondary coil. How you attach the oscilloscope depends on the individual equipment. Trigger of the primary coil. See how the secondary current relates to the primary current.

One thing to note. If you only have devices that read voltage, you can create an ammeter with a small resistor. Put the small resistor in series with the circuit. Read the voltage across that small resistor.

Kenneth Mellendorf



Click here to return to the Physics Archives

NEWTON is an electronic community for Science, Math, and Computer Science K-12 Educators, sponsored and operated by Argonne National Laboratory's Educational Programs, Andrew Skipor, Ph.D., Head of Educational Programs.

For assistance with NEWTON contact a System Operator (help@newton.dep.anl.gov), or at Argonne's Educational Programs

NEWTON AND ASK A SCIENTIST
Educational Programs
Building 360
9700 S. Cass Ave.
Argonne, Illinois
60439-4845, USA
Update: June 2012
Weclome To Newton

Argonne National Laboratory