Department of Energy Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science NEWTON's Homepage NEWTON's Homepage
NEWTON, Ask A Scientist!
NEWTON Home Page NEWTON Teachers Visit Our Archives Ask A Question How To Ask A Question Question of the Week Our Expert Scientists Volunteer at NEWTON! Frequently Asked Questions Referencing NEWTON About NEWTON About Ask A Scientist Education At Argonne Charges on Balloon
Name: Jim D.
Status: N/A
Age: 50s
Location: N/A
Country: N/A
Date: 2002

In The Energy Story Chapter 2: What is Electricity? at

there are the statements: "Try this experiment.

Rub a balloon on a wool sweater or on your hair. Then hold it up to a wall. The balloon will stay there by itself. Now rub two balloons, hold them by strings at the end and put them next to each other. They'll move apart.

Rubbing the balloons gives them static electricity. When you rub the balloon it picks up extra electrons from the sweater or your hair and becomes slightly negatively charged."

How many electrons are on the balloon after rubbing it on your hair?


I cannot say exactly, but I would roughly estimate the charge to be about 1 nanoCoulomb. This is not much of a charge, but it does work out to be about ten billion electrons. I cannot say for certain because things such as temperature, humidity, how hard you press, how fast you rub, and how the wool is sewn can all affect the number of electrons.

Dr. Ken Mellendorf
Physics Instructor
Illinois Central College

The "short answer" is NOT VERY MANY. To compare the strength of the gravitational force to the electrical force, it is instructive to compare the ratio of the force of gravitational attraction / force of electrical repulsion of two electrons, since so far as we know, the charge on the electron is the "fundamental" unit of electrical charge. This ratio is useful because both forces are proportional to: 1/ R^2 so in the ratio, the effect of distance,R, cancels (where the distances are not too too large or too too small).

That ratio is 0.24x10^-42. This fantastically small number is not an accident of the units of measure, but is a "pure" number. I have no idea what its significance is -- neither does Richard Feynman -- see "Lectures on Physics" Vol. I, chapter 7. That chapter is humbling if you ever get sloppy and think that we "understand" the nature of the fundamental forces operating in nature.


Click here to return to the Physics Archives

NEWTON is an electronic community for Science, Math, and Computer Science K-12 Educators, sponsored and operated by Argonne National Laboratory's Educational Programs, Andrew Skipor, Ph.D., Head of Educational Programs.

For assistance with NEWTON contact a System Operator (, or at Argonne's Educational Programs

Educational Programs
Building 360
9700 S. Cass Ave.
Argonne, Illinois
60439-4845, USA
Update: June 2012
Weclome To Newton

Argonne National Laboratory