Distant Light and Straight Lines
Name: Tim H.
Since the speed of light in a material equals the
inverse of the square root of the permitivity of the media times the
permeability of the media, and since outer space is not homogeneous (i.e. theres
cosmic dust etc.), how can we assume that light from distant stars has
travelled in a "straight line" from its original source for
billions/millions of years without ever encountering a transmission
media other than "free vacuum space"?
Light does not always get to us in a straight line. In addition to being
scattered by dust and "stuff" along the way it can be bent or "lensed" by
gravity as it passes massive bodies along the way.
We do not know for a fact that this is what has happened. The assumption is
based on probability. We have an approximation of the density of material
in space. Most of space is empty. Material in space tends to pull together
rather than staying evenly distributed. We can say that the probability of
a ray of light hitting something as it travels from a distant star to our
solar system is very low. Even if it does hit something, the material will
most likely be of a very irregular shape. This will cause a spreading out
of the light, a blurring, rather than a clear change of direction. We can
say that light our telescopes receive has probably traveled in a straight
Dr. Ken Mellendorf
Illinois Central College
I haven't done this, but perhaps you could go thru the numbers of typical interstellar gas
density, and multiply by the typical refractive index of a 1-atmosphere gas.
If you found there was less gas between the moon and most stars than between earth and low
orbit, maybe you'd be convinced.
Dust mostly doesn't count. It scatters or absorbs more than it refracts. We do see it's
effects in stellar nebulae and around the galactic core.
We don't find many clues of distortion with it. And nebulae are very lumpy places.
We don't see a lot of art-glass distortions when we look out there.
I think there would be some image-clues if distortions were present, such as double-images
of a spectrographically identifiable single object.
We have noticed at least one of those due to gravitaional distortion. Had to look pretty
hard to find one.
Elimination of short-wavelength light would have been noticed, too, if the light had
passed thru that much gas.
Come to think of it, the interstellar vacuum would glow noticeably blue, like our sky
during the day.
And distant stars would, in some slow, broad sense, twinkle. Or be obscured by the hazy
or blue glow.
Even the best gas isn't a perfectly clear medium.
Spectrographically, it's more like a picket fence. Over much of the spectrum it's
relatively clear, but at the strongest resonant frequencies it
stops more of the light from the star on the other side of it..
Spectroscopy like this is how we measure the interstellar or intergalactic gas density.
So if the light is significantly refracted, it shouldn't be gas that's doing it.
In principle there is some tiny refraction happening. Might be nice to figure out how
small we have proof that it is.
Click here to return to the Physics Archives
Update: June 2012