Measuring Snowfall Name: R. P. Status: educator Age: 20s Location: N/A Country: N/A Date: 2001 Question: I am teaching a unit on weather and I was studying up on the material. As I was reading the textbook, I started wondering about how snow is measured. The book stated that it is measured using a ruler, but is this possible? When snow starts to melt and then new snow falls, how accurate is a ruler? Replies: Dear R.P. The book is correct in stating that the most common way of measuring snow depth is with a ruler. This measurement is an indication of snow on the ground, not how much "snow that fell." You are correct in that many times snow does melt as it falls, or after falling, melts on the ground. So, the "snow depth" is continually changing, as new snow falls, melts, or compacts. Another way snow is measured, is by its "water equivalent." Snowfall is collected in a gauge that contains antifreeze, so it all melts as it falls. The increase in the amount of liquid in the gauge indicates the water equivalent of the snow. This varies with different kinds of snow, and some snows are characterized as "wet snows," and some as "dry snows." The water equivalent of wet snows may be as low as 6 or 8 to 1. This means 6 inches of snow equals one inch of liquid. A dry snow may have a ratio of 20 to 1, or even as high as 50 to 1 in very cold arctic regions. This means it would take 50 inches of snow to equal one inch of liquid. Water equivalent can also be determined by pushing a hollow tube through the snow, and melting the core. This is the way that water equivalent is measured in mountainous areas. Water equivalent is important in determining snowmelt and water runoff in the spring. Forecasts of river and stream flooding during the spring thaw utilize water equivalent as the primary indicator of the snow pack. Wendell Bechtold, meteorologist Forecaster, National Weather Service Weather Forecast Office, St. Louis, MO R. P., You have asked a very valid question. The best way to measure snowfall is with a ruler. You should average about a dozen measurements taken over a large area that is free from snow drifts. However, be careful to not penetrate the top of a layer of previous snowfall; sometimes that old layer is crusted at the top from thawing and re-freezing, making this easy. To prevent the problem of penetrating previous snowfalls while making the measurement, people at the National Weather Service use surfaces that they clean off after each snowfall or each hour of snowfall. You could do this also, even in your yard. If the temperature is near or above freezing, melting of the snow, even over the period of an hour can lead to underestimated snowfalls. I know of no way to combat this than to take measurements over a sufficiently short period of time that the compaction from melting is minimal. David R. Cook Atmospheric Research Section Environmental Research Division Argonne National Laboratory You are correct that measuring snow fall by "inches" is very dependent on the density of the snow, and the freeze thaw cycle compounds the uncertainty, and of course drifting has a big effect. The rough rule of thumb is that the ratio of snow / water // 10 / 1. You are correct, it is not very accurate. Vince Calder Click here to return to the Weather Archives

NEWTON is an electronic community for Science, Math, and Computer Science K-12 Educators, sponsored and operated by Argonne National Laboratory's Educational Programs, Andrew Skipor, Ph.D., Head of Educational Programs.

For assistance with NEWTON contact a System Operator (help@newton.dep.anl.gov), or at Argonne's Educational Programs